fnar.co.uk
For No Apparent Reason





Bush’s farewell fingers up to the world

Yesterday Israel refused a ceasefire, continuing it’s propaganda campaign against Palestine.

This morning the news was that George Bush was encouraging the Israeli army to attack Gaza, by claiming that the Palestinians should blame Hamas for the trouble they are facing.

This afternoon rallies were held around the world in protest at Israel’s continued air-strikes on Palestine. The Israeli’s have a good air-force, especially when you consider that the Palestinians only have measly rockets.

Within the last few minutes, Israel invaded Gaza.

Now is obviously the time to seriously reconsider any purchases you make of Israeli produce. I’d also say that now is a good time to reconsider any purchases you make of American produce.


Posted by Ric on January 3rd, 2009 :: Filed under Uncategorized

Are the Lib Dems for real?

A couple of years ago someone signed me up for the Liberal Democrats e-newsletter. I route it to my junk folder, but one email caught my eye.

Subject: Latest news from www.libdems.org.uk

Baker: Some train companies charge three times as much as others
----------------------------------------------

Research by the Liberal Democrats has found that some train companies in the UK are charging almost three times as much per mile as cheaper firms.

Did they really have to research this? Do Liberal Democrats ever travel by train? I’m sure this information has been widely known since the railways were privatised.

Norman Baker, the ’shadow’ shadow transport secretary (I thought only the largest opposition party had shadows, oh well), claimed it was absolutely disgraceful that a long-distance train co, such as First Great Western would charge more for a journey than Arriva Trains Wales.

Lets inspect those companies a little closer. Arriva Trains Wales has stock of small trains, which travel mostly local routes, serving local communities.

First Great Western operate BIG trains, from places like London to Exeter, Bristol, Cardiff and many other places - their trains are longer, bigger and have more facilities which cost more to upkeep.

Norman has figured out that the Government aren’t interested (neither were the previous Tories, or Blair). That’s because the Government does actually understand the economics of transport, and aren’t just a shadow shadow transport secretary.

Norman is now going to ask the Rail Regulator to investigate. You know what, I really hope they tell him where to go - I mean, if First Great Western passengers are that stupid to pay that price, let them…


Posted by Ric on December 27th, 2008 :: Filed under Uncategorized

Damian Green MP arrested

Looking into the story about the MP who got arrested under anti-terror laws, I went to Damian Green’s website.

I was slightly perturbed to find that the Tory shadow minister for immigration, who lives in Ashford, Kent, seems to use some strange language in regard to the French. “We can’t control them” seems to be his message, as he constantly pontificates how operation stack makes Ashford undesirable.

No, it’s not that we can’t control them. It’s that the French haven’t had their right to strike taken away by Thatcher. Ashford is undesirable because it’s Ashford (and because the MP has weird world views).


Posted by Ric on November 29th, 2008 :: Filed under Words

Strong words - one year on

A little over a year ago, I posted this video to YouTube:

I didn’t comment, and purely posted the video. My angle was from the media perspective. How did someone get away with calling a former Prime Minister a bitch on the BBC? I’ve just gone back to read the comments…

My favourite quote:

“Apparently it;s gunna cost 3 million quid for her funeral. For three million, they could give every Yorkshireman and Welshman a shovel, and we’d both be able to dig a hole so deep that we can hand her over to Satan personally!!! Let him deal with the Bitch Whore of England!!!”

People have asked how I feel about Margaret Thatcher. To be very honest, I grew up through her reign. I’ve never known such uncertain times, or such hatred towards her, and my parents are Tories!

It seems difficult for people to debate on the Thatcher issue without resorting to name-calling and childish behaviour, so old Maggie certainly seems to have the imagination of the country still. People get quite so het-up under the collar that they just have to start slagging people off with a different view point.

The reason I dislike Margaret Thatcher, and Conservatism in general, is that afterwards we all have a big price to pay:

  • Thatcher claimed buses were for the elderly and unemployed, no investment in transport.
  • Train services continued to decline, as no Government was willing to put money into it.
  • My school continued to fall apart around me as I was learning.
  • The face of my home town changed almost overnight, from mining and shipbuilding to call centres.
  • Everyone got the right to buy their Council home - now there are millions across the country staying in B&Bs at OUR expense, as taxpayers, due to a shortage of Council homes.
  • The rights allowing Trade Unions to organise and protest were vastly curtailed in the wake of the Miners’ strike - at the time MP Hillary Benn deemed Thatcher’s actions illegal. They were, but she ammended the law afterwards to suit her needs.

Posted by Ric on November 24th, 2008 :: Filed under Uncategorized

BBC Local Video Scheme Rejected

According to the BBC (so it must be true!), the BBC Trust has rejected a £68 million scheme to launch a network of 65 local news websites.

This comes in the same month that local newspaper bosses lobbied the Government, that local papers, which are already struggling, would be further damaged by an “out-of-control” BBC.

Sir Michael Lyons, the Chair of the BBC Trust - the body which replaced the BBC Board of Governors after the Hutton fiasco, jumped on this stance, seeing it as an opportunity to give the newspapers what they want. He told BBC news: “Our decision to refuse permission for local video means that local newspapers and other commercial media can invest in their online services in the knowledge that the BBC does not intend to make this new intervention in the market.”

Now, I hate to point out the obvious, but the Local Newspapers and the BBC Governors, masquerading in ‘trust’ have forgotten that:

  • By the way they are formed and report on the news, newspapers are biased.
  • Newspapers have had long enough to build a decent local news service.

If newspapers can’t fill the void, who will?

Example - the Sunderland Echo today has video online - but NONE of it is actually news. How is that providing a good local service? It’s not like they haven’t had a chance to invest.

The BBC ‘Trust’ needs to re-evaluate whether it sees itself as the champion of the audience, or the champion of the newspaper barrons. At the moment it’s the latter, and that’s not a good bed to lie in.

Update: Sir Michael Lyons has just proved the point in his statement at a BBC Press Conference:

“For the foreseeable future BBC management must drop its plans to expand its online services as outlined in this application. Instead, the Trust has requested management to increase the quality of its existing television and radio services and – without an increase in budgets – its existing online services. Local newspapers and other commercial media have the assurance they need that the BBC does not intend to make this new intervention in the market. They can therefore sustain and improve their offering to the public secure in this knowledge and I hope they will do just that.

Okay, so we lose a very much improved local news service, in the hope that someone else will provide it.

What a pile of crap.


Posted by Ric on November 21st, 2008 :: Filed under Words

Just what the hell is Cameron on?

David Cameron has been on the radio again, this time slagging off the BBC.

Obviously he’s completely forgotten that the BBC has shed thousands upon thousands of jobs over the last few years, and is not the bloated behemoth he seems to think it is. If he wants to stop bloated public organisations, perhaps the Civil Service would be a better place to start waving sticks about.

Alternatively, he could leave broadcasting to the broadcasters, running the country to those capable, and go find himself a new career more suited to his ego.


Posted by Ric on November 3rd, 2008 :: Filed under Uncategorized

Boris is still finding his way.

Back in March 2008 I pointed out that there are 1,043,761 buffoons in London, and signalled the death knell to the London we know and love.

Bendy Bus Advert

Twenty-five weeks on, how is Boris doing on those pledges?

First thing of note is that the Venezuelan oil deal brokered by Ken Livingstone has been scrapped. As a result, TfL does not have enough cash, and will raise bus and tube fares in January as a result. The Freedom Pass is still working for the elderly and the disabled, but for how much longer?

I’m not even going to think about the time and cost dedicated by Ken Livingstone’s office to broker the deal, the air miles flown to set it up, the carbon emissions to set it up, all down the pan because Boris believes that helping the Venezuelan capital Caracas to transform itself into a modern Capital City is not worth doing.

Here’s a quote from Boris on the subject of Bendy Buses:

“[Bendy buses] have twice as many collisions with pedestrians and cyclists than other buses.”
Boris Johnson, Conservative mayoral manifesto, 19 March 2008

According to “This is London” (Evening Standard, owned by the Daily Mail group), a consultation has begun into axing the Bendy Bus on routes 38, 507 and 521. There’s no sign of a consultation taking place on the bus, at any bus stops, or on Boris or TfL’s websites - only in this article from This is London.

Looking into the facts a little more, I have a few questions for our eccentric Mayor.

  1. If these buses are quite so dangerous, and are putting off cyclists, why have both the bendy bus and cycling seen massive increases in London in the last few years?
  2. Bendy buses work in other European cities, including places which drive on the left such as Dublin. Why is London different? Is it because London doesn’t spend the money adapting the roads?
  3. Bendy buses do not use every road in London, and stick to busier routes. Cyclists tend to avoid the main arterial routes, surely the number of cyclists put off by the buses is constrained?
  4. When are you going to start talking to London’s cycling groups about their perception of the buses? To save you time, they are busy campaigning against HGV vehicles, not bendy buses.
  5. How many people have been seriously injured by the buses, compared to HGV vehicles?
  6. How many people have been killed on a bike by a bendy bus? (I can answer this one - zero).

Bendy buses carry 149 passengers - about 60 more than a conventional double deck bus. This means that scrapping the bendy bus in favour of more standard buses will mean more crowding, increased costs (each bendy bus you take off the road will need to be replaced by more than one conventional bus, meaning more drivers, more fuel, more traffic, more carbon emissions…). Oh yeah, the bendy buses also speed up your journey by decreasing dwell times (the time it takes you and me to get on and off).

Back to the quote that bendy buses have twice as many collisions with cyclists and pedestrians. I still can’t find a reliable source for this, though TfL gave Channel 4 some figures to show that between January 1994 and September 2007 there were 0.05 fatalities per million km operated by bendy buses, and 0.08 per million km operated by routemasters. That’s fatalities - on the subject of collisions, Channel 4 unearthed something rather worrying from a political perspective:

Boris was able to massage the statistics his way, by comparing collisions on all 12 bendy bus routes to collisions on 15 carefully selected non-bendy routes.

We need a Mayor suited to London, who understands London, and has actually used a bloody London bus day in day out to understand what we’re all going through. Unfortunately, 1,043,761 “Londoners” spoiled it for the rest of us.


Posted by Ric on October 23rd, 2008 :: Filed under Boris Johnson

Winter of discontent - mark two

Gordon Brown released his plans to help those facing a fuel poverty over this winter. The need for action is in response to rising energy costs.

The £8.50/week cold weather payment will rise to a handsome £25/week - so long as the temperature stays below Zero celsius for seven consecutive days. Apart from the half-million poorest households (and some of those will undoubtedly be single-person households) fuel prices will continue to rise. Other help is with insulation.

So how the hell is that going to help people this winter? Will my aged relatives get their houses lagged for free before the cold weather they can’t afford to heat their homes through comes heading to our shores?

It would appear that the Government may have scored another own goal. One of incompetence, and showing just how out of touch the upper echelons of Labour are, compared with the grass roots of the party.


Posted by Ric on September 11th, 2008 :: Filed under Whinges

London Assembly Member picks nose and eats it


Posted by Ric on August 1st, 2008 :: Filed under Pictures

Contact!

As 0870 numbers start to get annoying to people, the Financial Ombudsman Service has a gem on their website.

You can call their 0845 number, or if you’re calling from a mobile or get free minutes, they give you a standard number to call too.

Now that’s good service.


Posted by Ric on July 22nd, 2008 :: Filed under Words